The Fleening of Chupaqueso.com

Posted January 18th, 2006 by Howard Tayler

Ordinarily when a blog gets blogged, the blogged blog is the only blog to mention the blogging, and may blog back. When Fleen blogged Chupaqueso.com, however, the blogging blog was also a blog of topical interest in the blogged blog’s blogger’s OTHER blog (even if that relationship requires the blogged blog’s blogger to blog a fourth blog in his other blog in order to establish the connection). The end result here is that the blogging blog and the blogged blog both get blogged by the blogged blog’s blogger in his other blog.

Thank you, and good morning.

Explore posts in the same categories: Food, Site News

32 Comments on “The Fleening of Chupaqueso.com”

  1. CM Schroeder Says:

    Ordinarily when a smirf gets smirfed, the smirfed smirf is the only smirf to mention the smirfing, and may smirf back. When Fleen smirfed Chupaqueso.com, however, the smirfing smirf was also a smirf followed by the smirfed smirf’s smirfer’s OTHER smirf, and happened to be a topically related smirf besides. Which means that the smirfing smirf and the smirfed smirf both get smirfed by the smirfed smirf’s smirfer in his other smirf.

    hank you, and good smirfing

  2. Ranbato Says:

    Looks like you SMURFed up that comment. It would have been a lot SMURFier if you had spelt it right. 8-p

  3. Jay Maynard Says:

    My brain hurts.

  4. James Pietan Says:

    Now, both of you say that real fast 10 times in a row…..

  5. Jeff Lowrey Says:

    %&$*ing bloggers.

    (this comment has been moderated)

  6. Dennis Hostetler Says:

    Egads man! You may have ripped a hole in the Blog-Time continuum.

  7. Derrill Says:

    This should probably be the eighth deadly sin.

  8. Ken Says:

    I’m with jay… of course, we can just **SMURF** what I think, in this instance…

  9. Paul Says:

    Of course it helps if the blog that is blogged about on another bloggers is actually readable…

  10. Howard Tayler Says:

    Yeah, something’s up, but I’m not sure what. I emailed Jay about it. Both Tronguy.net and chupaqueso.com are unreachable right now. It’s been up and down all morning.

    So much for free publicity…

  11. lurker Says:

    Wuh?

  12. Cyclops Says:

    I think you Bloging broke me….

    Anyone capable of drawing that all into a chart or something?

    Oh well. At least we know the Wordpress system can handle a large number of links in one post….

  13. Nix Says:

    I think it suffered an ultrablogolent catastrophe, owing to virtual blog-references circling around the schlockmercenary.com->chupaqueso.com->fleen.com->… loop, amplifying to a flood of infinitely many self-references that closed the blog’s mouth.

    (And if you close your mouth when trying to get a chupaqueso into it, the result is liable to be catastrophic. Well, catastrophically messy, anyway.)

  14. Paul Says:

    Perhaps if we could seal the blogger and the bloggie into a toroidal magnetic field, we could actually generate free wastes of energy.

  15. zandperl Says:

    It makes a lot more sense if you hover over the “blogged blog’s blogger” -type links and see to what they are referring.

  16. Bobcat Says:

    Well, we have Blog. Blog and cheese. Blog eggs sausage and Blog. Blog, Blog, baked beans, Blog Blog and Blog…

    (Bloggy Vikings!)

  17. Derek Says:

    A statement like that is a sign of a good mind in need of rest. Or caffine.

  18. Sailor Jim Johnston Says:

    Okay, I think I got it … you’re saying that things got kinda blogged down for awhile, right?

  19. Ken Says:

    Wow. I’ve been told that the winner of the Field’s Medal (the highest prize in mathematics) often wins either for opening a new field of study, or for closing off an existing field (by proving the Big Theorems).

    The word ‘blog’ has now reached its pinnacle. That’s it! Howard wins! No one can use this word anymore!

  20. Alan Wadey Says:

    OOOOWWW!! That hurt my brain, it’s only 8am here you know!

  21. CyborgGarfield Says:

    Mmmmmmmmmmmm! Smurfs! Smothered in cheese and BBQ’d over a…

    Sorry about that! That first comment must have caused an overload or something!

  22. bart Says:

    Euhm yeah, could you repeat that in English? Or French? Or even Klingon? you know some language I can actually understand?

  23. Tice with a J Says:

    Putting the “Blargh!” in blog, are we?

  24. KMeist Says:

    Ack! We’ve been flog- erm – BLOGGED! Yeah, that’s it BLOGGED. I think… Glogged? Glocked? Locked? Clocked? Ack! IT’S SECOND GRADE ALL OVER AGAIN…

    Anyway, congradulations on the Triple Blogging!

  25. Lon Rombough Says:

    Have you been to a seance? You sound like you’re channeling Abbot and Costello.

  26. Howard Tayler Says:

    THIRD BASE!

  27. Best Cameras Says:

    Good Blog keep it up…

  28. oil fragrance Says:

    good article i like it…Blue Diamonds

  29. Camera Shop Says:

    good article. i like your site

  30. Top Diamonds Says:

    wowo nice article i love it keep it up

  31. CrazyDreamer Says:

    Hmm. Picking up some spam back here.

  32. Sam Says:

    Blogging smurf! Oh, well, at least you’ve got rel=’nofollow’ on those links, so the spammers haven’t actually gotten any pagerank out of it.

    So… back in April and May of 2006, blog-spammers were advertising cameras, perfume and diamonds. What the blog? I thought Viagra was invented before then.

    “For attempted murder, murder, attempted suicide, suicide, attempted spam, or actual spam, press three.” (Of course, we wouldn’t be on that menu, because what we have here is a crime scene, not a crime in progress.)

    I think the penalty for email spam should be one second in jail per spam sent. (To be served consecutively, of course.) I don’t know what an appropriate penalty would be for blog spam, but the fact that it’s sometimes abbreviated “blam” could be considered a suggestion.

    Heh. Remember when one of the really big spammers got whacked by the Russian mafia? I hoped it was because he spammed the wrong guy, but it turned out to be a business dispute. He was clearly in the wrong – the dispute was over whether he needed the protection of the Russian mafia.

Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.